Advertising

Sunday 29 May 2011

Interpretation of the multiplier and the reverse of the literary text

About criticism and psychological umbrella:
1. Cash: a personal vision for a pop critic for the study of literary accomplishment, and justified it. The more substantive nature gained the credibility and value in the literary arena. This gives acquisitions Monetary Authority and the authority not only to him, but damage. Monetary and sober stands on two pillars: the care, the Secretariat literary / and general knowledge of necessity, and private in the field of criticism. And their employment fairly high and to the extent that the completed bear literary or text form and content. For close-up, the reproduction of the text by the critic mu'awwal like to reproduce a film of the novel techniques better technical. For example, re-produce the film "Zorba," a novel by Greek author Nikos Kazantzakis, it may not be referred by the producer or director on the novel "Crime and Punishment" by Russian writer Fyodor Dostoyevsky. Or that the shocking scenes the character "Zorba" has suddenly turned into a personal "Jean Valjean" known in the novel "Les Miserables" or "desperate" for the French author Victor Hugo, this distortion and hybrid versions Bmndz nothing to do with his origin.
2. The purposes of criticism: It can be deleted from the slogan: dynamic interaction with the building momentum in the literary community. Under this concept is limited to jobs and functions of the critic.
3. The identity of the completed literary: not the identity of what was produced by man since the beginning of creation in the field of literature in different Mcharbh and Ozmenth non-identity literature, and may not give the identity of ideology, ideological or Zmancanip and others, or classification on the basis only if the door Markup formal to tell, for example, an era / geographical area and / or the prevailing character in the literary content, and the like. And critical reading of the right to adopt the completed literary and ripen the identity of the writer, to involve identities disrupt the actual value of the completed insertion of interpretations of negative or positive. Word for Akhttal (and is one of the poets of the Umayyad period feel) in the Book of Songs to Abu Faraj al-Isfahani, that one day he said to his interlocutors: "The world does not care about hair .. if passed by the House Standards, stepper good, he said Omoslem or Christian."
4. Relationship started Bmndzh moral: stick intimate, all done and the newborn baby to the writer understood by others, aware of the purposes and recognizes the mystery of birth and Ntefth First, although the result of the unconscious, and when submitted become an independent entity for the public at the receiver, and a world of self-contained does not require cash, but critic summon (ie calls performed) to engage in creative interaction Buthaimp spaciousness.
5. The difference between the writer and critic in his capacity as a writer: writer feigns article of his literary heritage and the environment and various factors have no or limited to, the critic does not make up its article but keeps a writer of his article, and in Mtogla Boatnha surpassing the reading surface or phenomenon. In other words, the critic connects the sub-phenomena, and the tree interpretive Bjdhirha within the soil, the text or the article writer, but they are either fabricated to add value, or imagined critic of what he left the text of the writer of the impact of Inziahi "very special" in the mind does not know its causes or conscious, may not be provided this effect in terms of "private" as cash unless it can be justified from within the completed and linked to an objective. Can in general for each recipient was critical or not, to the effect which the accomplished literary impression and impact on himself, in thought or poetry article or Sredep .. etc, and its potential as written. Literature has produced literature as a culture, and writer influenced by ethics and the arts different eras and times far back, and dealing with folklore, myth and epic in the work of creative and poetic fertilized by the imagination and manifestation as influenced by the ethics and the arts present, and critic in his capacity as a writer, has to deal with what he wants and make up pursuant to a creative and fruitful not provide all Echtlgah as money.
6. Selection of the finished literary critic: There must be a self-clean selection is subject to the influential literary only, and not a selection of characters, and the concerns of abstract ideological affiliations, intellectual and personal impressions. Is not ruled by the critic in this regard is the first pillar of criticism to which I, a careful literary and the Secretariat, and the critic finds to neutrality in the selection and engage with serenity and balance without external stimulation or prejudge. This will set the creative criticism free from impurities and self Noazaaha impurities and the community.
7. Tripartite relationship between the recipient and the article writer and critic: This relationship can be expressed equation, "cash equivalent" which involved two, I read the article the writer and the recipient, and the second article the writer and critic has read the receiver. This is the last recipient of a serious, professional, or must be, and therefore achieve a balance equation, if Ghabc or lack of clarity is a feature of the first party, if the material is complex or surrealist, critic or try to remove complexity. Add external stimulation by the critic for the tip, will saddle the equation. For example, add a personal clerk, and the basis of personal knowledge. Personal knowledge is not a "documented biography", so that added to the sides of the equation on both, and cash-like equation or mathematical equation of constraint that can not endure the addendum to the party without the other. To clarify, the critic can approach the identity of the author and try to analyze or read through pretty badly in the context of his study, and not vice versa. Character of the writer to seek cash pretty badly, does not benefit the public beyond the prejudices that usually rejected or was aware of, there will benefit him the knowledge argument as a means of understanding what he reads, but may mislead or Tchoch understood that the assessment of the characters vary somewhat among humans contrast. This pattern of cash reverse (ie, textual criticism and interpretation features writer) I am pleased to call "the critique or criticism objectors closeness" to a narrow circle, it is directed to the recipient harmonious in advance with the writer, as measured by cash literary "public" which deals with done in isolation from the author and attributes do not affect approach or an equation.
8. Depart from the objective: You may come for substantive knowingly critic of it (keep this in mind going out that any critic) by giving interpretations of how the cumulative including not bear accomplished literary horizon, occurs between peremptory accomplished writer and make him feel alienated from what books, and the same with the receiver and what he read. This exit is a violation of the sanctity of Ptsouri accomplished literary, and a departure from the professional and academic impair the function of the critic first, relying upon the exclusion of weird, and without prejudice to the cultural scene II. And the author of the text usually does not oppose such a violation because the employee is mostly for him. There is a saying flagrant Besraanha untapped in some books on literary criticism, the old Arab, namely: the critic does not get out of the egg from his pocket, and it claims that the chicken egg standing there. The deterioration of the cultural scene, the recipient of the Arab intake often phenomena and characters, you may deceive him such money, or fear of confrontation substantive power of the critic or modesty of it, has resorted to questioning their own culture and explains the proposals cash relatively thin or totally objective with his poverty of knowledge and the inability of tools for understanding the material written because it avoids the question or inquiry so as not to frustrate. This departure from objectivity by the critic on the one hand, and the setback of the recipient or retirement for constructive interaction with the material of cash on the other hand, for many reasons related to the nature of the Arab reality and the suffering of the dilemmas of social, moral, intellectual, and political implications of psychology, ie, AVAILABILITY rationality Arab in general swing often between sanctification and the desecration and industry preoccupied with the precious and the vile and at various levels, including the literary, and this thorny issue could be a long talk in the corridors. Negligence or poor tools critic and culture of the public, may be graduating from the corner of the substantive as well, and in all conditions, "a departure from objectivity" requires an alert critic and Mjadlth objectively, this heavy duty must be borne by the recipient to activate its role as a important element in the Trinity literary "writer / critic / receiver "in order to preserve the integrity of the literary scene and to try to elevate it relatively cellars of loyalty and courtesy, and culture initiation, the prevailing delivery which won him also.
9. The language of literary criticism: The language of the statement of the obvious, do not accept or require interpretation Fezahrha interior, and vice versa. For example, and zoom, single "Water" and responded that the cash is in the article "Water" This is a chemical compound of two atoms of hydrogen and oxygen atom, which we drink every day, but in the accomplished literary and especially poetry, because I did have other connotations. This does not necessarily mean the provision of article language research dry and boring, but it is most effective that does not come out by the Department of "disclosure statement" and will be the only article bra is the other aspects. If the purpose of a single "Water" news on the stream of virtue in the text that dealt with, for example, Vliketbha "The water of virtue" to stand the receiver on the material evidence of understanding and comprehension, and difficult to dredge "interpretation of interpretation."
10. Attribute critic Qualification: renounce sleep and rely on "absolute" in the world of literary done, because the process of interpretation itself is hard work tirelessly and circle the significance of mobility and track changes that affect the meaning, signs and symbols in Ckol verbal texts. This "passion" is derived from attribute overview of sleep, paid cash to leave the article in the hands of the receiver wide open doors for the continuation of the investigation and a puppet in the excavation done and connects the reservoirs and the participation of the recipient this time. And unless the critic has this attribute will close pretty badly Istekin shadow monetary and renouncing the movement of the receiver. It is worth mentioning, Book texts reject exploration Bgalbhm receiver and prefer to read bereaved praise and commendation. While accomplished literary project is open to debate and criticism can not be stamped with certainty critic or a whole generation of critics. There are literary achievements demonstrated its value after the departure of her book, or after a while.
11. Writing in general and the writer and the receiver is idle: Check any written material, including self-imposed by the value and benefit, and fruitful not held by the recipient the name of the author, there is anticipation pens write better quality and authenticity of the flags referred stigmatized them. And perspective in the literary scene is the assessment through the names and characters in isolation from the value of literary material, and therefore serious implications Ohzaretha Tl_khasia to "idle writer and recipient." After that the author enjoys the immunity of the infallibility of fame and prestige may tend to lean and tends to the best. The production is later, regardless of actual value and the quality, received by the recipient revered and admiration Besith obsessed, and this lesion has been able to the literary scene. Perhaps aware that the products of the stallions poets old and all in his name, not to the same level and value, and produced by the jeweler, Naguib Mahfouz and Hanna Mina, Jubran, and Nazik and Sayab and Maghout, Baudelaire, Eliot and Neruda and Adonis and pound and all the writers and poets in the world, it was not the same quality and value creative, not a defect in or this is OK, because the process of creative writer is a process of vibrant humanity that can not be a straight line, but a line chart Mtzbma like the scheme and reduce the human heart. We all know that the cardiogram that was a straight line means stop, or death and demise.
12. Conclusion and Q: Monetary cultural activity generally follows the evolution of knowledge, science and acquire them. In the Arab world is still cash perspective, a traditional activity cumulatively did not develop techniques or induced, while the borrowed money in the civilized world many of the social sciences and natural sciences, psychological and otherwise, for example, there is no room to push in this field, borrowed money tests and the work of the unconscious or subconscious mind and how it reflects their wishes underlying repercussions language and image, and a survey of verbal and spatial confusion similar to what occurs in dreams, and the metaphors of fruitful to study the characteristics of the literary text objectively shaded flag. The Arab people are Sichaeloggio (Alternative Science), which cast a shadow split end in every nook and corner, and the angle obtuse angle literary shadows. I conclude this part of a general question: how much we are honest with ourselves, and really are interested in our culture for the production of value?
Follows ..

No comments:

Post a Comment